1.
Aarts, A. A., J. E. Anderson, C. J. Anderson, P. R. Attridge, A. Attwood, and Anna
Fedor. “Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science.” Science 349, no.
6251 (2015): 1-8.
2.
Baker, Monya. “1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility.” Nature News 533,
no. 7604 (2016): 452.
3.
Begley, C. Glenn, and John PA Ioannidis. “Reproducibility in science.” Circulation
research 116, no. 1 (2015): 116-126.
4.
Dreber, Anna, Thomas Pfeiffer, Johan Almenberg, Siri Isaksson, Brad Wilson,
Yiling Chen, Brian A. Nosek, and Magnus Johannesson. “Using prediction
markets to estimate the reproducibility of scientific research.” Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences 112, no. 50 (2015): 15343-15347.
5.
Etz, Alexander, and Joachim Vandekerckhove. “A Bayesian perspective on the
reproducibility project: Psychology.” PLoS One 11, no. 2 (2016): e0149794.
6.
Gezelter, J. Daniel. “Open source and open data should be standard practices.”
(2015): 1168-1169.
7.
Open Science Collaboration. “Estimating the reproducibility of psychological
science.” Science 349, no. 6251 (2015): aac4716.
8.
Pashler, Harold, and Eric–Jan Wagenmakers. “Editors’ introduction to the
special section on replicability in psychological science: A crisis of confidence?.”
Perspectives on Psychological Science 7, no. 6 (2012): 528-530.
9.
Scannell, Jack W., and Jim Bosley. “When quality beats quantity: decision
theory, drug discovery, and the reproducibility crisis.” PloS one 11, no. 2 (2016):
e0147215.